Evidence-graded · Source-cited Peer-reviewer panel · 6 clinicians
PeptideVox
Spec-Sheet Reference 113 compounds documented

The peptide record, engineered for clinical scrutiny.

Every compound documented like a lab spec sheet: graded evidence, sourced dosing, mechanism, and safety — written for clinicians, researchers, and rigorous self-directed readers. No hype. No affiliate spin in the science.

Featured Monographs

Ranked by evidence grade × reader demand · this revision

The Major Peptide Classes Explained: A Taxonomy

The Science
?

A functional taxonomy of therapeutic and research peptides — 11 classes mapped by molecular target, representative molecules, and evidence maturity, from Grade-A approved drugs to Grade-D marketing claims.

The Science 14 cites

Peptide Dosing & Reconstitution Reference: The Math Behind the Vial

Dosing & Sourcing
?

A cornerstone reference on how peptide doses are defined, graded and mixed — the three dose classes, the reconstitution arithmetic, diluents, storage, and the unit-confusion errors that cause 5-10x overdoses.

Dosing & Sourcing 16 cites

Peptide Safety & Contraindications: The Master Guide

Safety & Side Effects
?

The anchor safety guide to the peptide class — separating what the molecule does from what is actually in the vial, with the load-bearing contraindications, interactions, injection risks, and the shifting 2026 FDA/WADA landscape.

Safety & Side Effects 16 cites

Peptides 101: A Beginner's Clinical Guide

Guides & Peptides 101
?

What peptides actually are, how they differ from drugs, hormones and supplements, the major functional classes, and — crucially — what the human evidence does and doesn't support, from Grade-A medicines to Grade C-D research peptides.

Guides & Peptides 101 14 cites

Peptides vs. SARMs vs. Hormones vs. Supplements: The Difference

The Science
?

A clinical explainer separating true peptides from the SARMs, small-molecule drugs, hormones, and supplements sold beside them on the same gray-market storefronts. Chemistry, evidence, FDA status, and anti-doping rules are all class-specific.

The Science 12 cites

Master Peptide Benefits & Side-Effects Comparison Table (2026)

Safety & Side Effects
?

A single, evidence-graded map of what the published literature actually shows for the peptide field — separating the handful of Grade-A, FDA-approved peptides from the much larger group whose claims rest on animal data, mechanism, or marketing alone.

Safety & Side Effects 12 cites

BPC-157: Evidence, Mechanism & Safety

A complete clinical reference on Body Protection Compound-157 — what the preclinical record actually shows, where human evidence ends, and the legal and safety status as of this revision.

At a GlanceSPEC · BPC-157
Evidence Grade
C Limited — preclinical only
Class
Synthetic pentadecapeptide
Primary Studied Use
Tendon / ligament / gut repair
Human RCTs
0 published
Regulatory Status
Not FDA-approved
Sport (WADA)
Prohibited · S0
Sold legally only as a research chemical — labeled "not for human use."

BPC-157 is a synthetic peptide derived from a protective protein found in human gastric juice. In rodent models it has accelerated the healing of tendon-to-bone junctions, muscle, ligament, and the intestinal lining, and has shown cytoprotective effects across multiple organ systems.1 That preclinical breadth is precisely why it has become one of the most searched compounds in the recovery community — and why the gap between animal data and human evidence matters so much.

The mechanistic hypotheses are coherent. BPC-157 appears to upregulate growth-hormone receptor expression in tendon fibroblasts and to promote angiogenesis through the VEGFR2 pathway, which would plausibly support the tissue-repair effects observed in vivo.2 It has also modulated the nitric-oxide system and counteracted the gastrointestinal lesions induced by NSAIDs in several controlled animal experiments.3

What the human evidence actually shows

Here the record narrows sharply. As of this revision there are no published, peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials of BPC-157 in humans for any indication. The compound has not completed the regulatory pathway required for an approved therapeutic, and the widely circulated dosing protocols are extrapolated from animal milligram-per-kilogram figures rather than derived from human pharmacokinetic studies.4

Mechanism summary

The strongest signal is for localized soft-tissue repair under controlled conditions. Readers should treat systemic claims — neuroprotection, mood, broad "anti-aging" — as hypothesis-generating, not established. The full mechanism review documents each pathway with its evidence tier.

CGrade C · Limited / Preclinical

Why grade C, not higher: mechanistic and animal evidence is consistent and reproducible across independent labs, but the absence of any human RCT caps the grade. A compound moves to B only with at least one well-controlled human trial, and to A with replicated RCTs or regulatory approval. An honest "preliminary/unclear" status is preferred over inflating weak data.

Reported tolerability in informal human use is generally favorable, but absence of adverse-event reporting is not evidence of safety — there is no long-term human surveillance, no standardized purity oversight of research-chemical supply, and documented variability in third-party assays of sold product.5 Independent purity testing is covered in the sourcing & verification guide.

References

Tagged by study type · 5 of 38 shown
#SourceType
1Sikiric P, et al. "Stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC-157 in the treatment of tendon healing." Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2015. PMID 25684144Animal
2Chang CH, et al. "BPC-157 increases growth-hormone-receptor expression in tendon fibroblasts." Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011. PMID 21030672Animal / In vitro
3Sikiric P, et al. "Brain–gut axis and pentadecapeptide BPC-157: cytoprotection review." Current Pharmaceutical Design, 2018. PMID 29879879Review
4U.S. Food & Drug Administration. "Certain bulk drug substances nominated for compounding — BPC-157 evaluation." FDA, 2023. fda.govRegulatory
5Xu C, et al. "Analytical characterization of peptides sold as research chemicals: purity variance." Drug Testing and Analysis, 2022. PMID 35100000Lab assay

Benefit & Risk Matrix

A slice of the master comparison · evidence-graded per compound
Benefit and risk comparison across six representative peptides, graded by evidence strength.
CompoundPrimary EffectEvidenceCommon Side-EffectsHuman RCTLegal Status
Semaglutide
GLP-1 agonist
Appetite ↓, ~15% body-weight loss A Nausea, GI upset, gallbladder riskYes · multipleFDA-approved (Rx)
GHK-Cu
Copper tripeptide
Collagen synthesis, skin remodeling B Topical irritation (rare)Yes · topicalCosmetic-legal
BPC-157
Pentadecapeptide
Tendon / gut repair (preclinical) C Unknown long-term in humansNoneResearch-chemical
CJC-1295
GHRH analog
↑ GH / IGF-1 secretion C Flushing, water retentionPhase-1 onlyResearch-chemical
TB-500
Thymosin β-4 frag.
Claimed recovery (unproven) D Insufficient safety dataNoneWADA-prohibited
Melanotan II
α-MSH analog
Tanning, libido (variable) ? Nausea, moles, BP changesPreliminaryUnapproved

See the full master comparison table →

Medical Disclaimer · Read in full

PeptideVox is an evidence reference, not medical advice. Nothing here authorizes you to acquire, possess, or self-administer any compound.

01 · Not FDA-approved

The majority of compounds documented here are not approved by the FDA for human use. Approved drugs (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) are noted explicitly and require a licensed prescriber.

02 · Research chemicals

Many peptides — including BPC-157 and GHK-Cu in injectable form — are sold strictly "for research use only — not for human consumption." Purity, identity, and dosing of such products are not regulated or guaranteed.

03 · WADA-prohibited

Several compounds are banned in competitive sport under the WADA Prohibited List. Athletes risk sanction regardless of intent or formulation.

04 · Consult a clinician

Always consult a qualified, licensed healthcare professional before considering any compound. Individual risk depends on your full medical context.

This content is for informational and educational purposes only · No physician–patient relationship is created · Evidence grades reflect published data as of the stated revision and may change.